-

Difference between revisions of "EU Codefest 2012"

From Open Bioinformatics Foundation
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎EU-codefest 2012 was 19 and 20 July in Lodi Italy)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
= EU-codefest 2012 will be 19 and 20 July in Lodi Italy =
+
= EU-codefest 2012 was 19 and 20 July in Lodi Italy =
  
−
In coordination with the [[BOSC]] committee we are organising the first EU-Codefest, a low-key event the week after [[BOSC 2012]] in California.  
+
In coordination with the [[BOSC]] committee we organised the first EU-[[Codefest]], a low-key event the week after [[BOSC 2012]] in California.  
  
−
The EU-Codefest will take place on 19 and 20 July 2012, in [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.31&lon=9.508&zoom=10&layers=M Lodi, Italy], near the Bergamo and Milano airports (Bergamo is a hub for Ryanair).
+
15 people attended the EU-Codefest, which took place on 19 and 20 July 2012, in [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.31&lon=9.508&zoom=10&layers=M Lodi, Italy], near Bergamo and Milano.
  
−
The EU-Codefest is modeled on the successful biohackathons in Japan, though we would like it more free-flowing. There will be few invited speakers, and instead attendees will have a chance to give micro-presentations on their ongoing open source projects. In short, the focus of the EU-Codefest will be on coding, open source projects, and general fun. We also hope to show BOSC talks on video. You are invited to bring in your own open source software project, and to see how others can collaborate and involve it into general Open-Bio.
+
The EU-Codefest is modeled on the successful biohackathons in Japan, though we like it more free-flowing.  
  
−
The weekend after 21 and 22 July we can continue (unofficially) to have a good time, and will organise some outings.
+
The weekend after 21 and 22 July continued (unofficially) to have a good time, and organised some outings.
  
−
Please [http://tecnoparco.org/codefest register] if you are interested in attending. Places are served on a first-come basis, and the number of places is limited.
+
Organising committee: Francesco Strozzi, Raoul Bonnal and Pjotr Prins
 +
 
 +
== Location ==
  
−
Organising committee: Francesco Strozzi, Raoul Bonnal and Pjotr Prins
+
[http://www.tecnoparco.org/ Parco Tecnologico Padano]
 +
vie Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza
 +
26900, [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.31&lon=9.508&zoom=10&layers=M Lodi] - ITALY
  
 
== Topics ==
 
== Topics ==
  
−
Three main topics will be worked on during the CodeFest:
+
Three main topics were worked on during the CodeFest:
  
 
* NGS and high performance parsers for OpenBio projects.
 
* NGS and high performance parsers for OpenBio projects.
Line 21: Line 25:
 
* Bioinformatics pipelines definition, execution and distribution.
 
* Bioinformatics pipelines definition, execution and distribution.
  
−
other tracks are welcome!
+
During the conference we discussed current issues and added
 +
 
 +
* Service discovery and integration (Debian, BioMoby, biogems.info, BioLinux)
 +
* Workflow (bio-ngs, Galaxy, Taverna)
 +
* PBS (bio-ngs)
 +
* Software
 +
** bio-ngs
 +
** bio-maf introducing into pipeline
 +
** gff3
 +
** biogems.info (Debian packages)
 +
** bio-table (RDF support)
 +
** biowsr
 +
 
 +
== Talks ==
 +
 
 +
The following talks/introductions/micro-presentations were given at the Codefest:
 +
 
 +
* ''Semantic Web for the Integrated Genomic Data'' by Toshiaki Katayama, Database Center for Life Science, Tokyo, Japan
 +
* ''Writing the worlds fastest GFF3 parser'' by Marjan Povolni, Faculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad, Serbia
 +
* ''Debian packaging'' by Steffen Möller, University of Lübeck, Germany
 +
* ''BioWSR Bioinformatic Web Services Registry project update'' by José María Fernández González, Protein Design Group, CNB-CSIC Cantoblanco, Madrid,
 +
Spain
 +
* ''RNA-seq project introduction'' by James Tojo, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
 +
* ''Software resources for Bioinformatics, including http://biogems.info/'' by Pjotr Prins, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
 +
 
 +
== Reports ==
 +
 
 +
=== Bio-ngs ===
 +
 
 +
We worked on developing bio-ngs to better handle pipelines
 +
and reproducible workflows, plus semantic databases to manage and query NGS sec
 +
ondary analysis data.
 +
 
 +
=== Bio RDF support ===
 +
 
 +
During the codefest we discussed the ins- and outs of graph stores, and the semantic web (triple stores). We now share a vision on how to move forward, using
 +
RDF for biological analysis. The next biohackathon will be in Japan in September 2012. Four of us will be there to continue this work.
 +
 
 +
=== Adding a list of BioLinux Software packages to biogems.info ===
 +
 
 +
We recognise is it often hard to find relevant information on current software packages.
 +
At the USA codefest, a week earlier, Brad Chapman and Hervé Ménager created a Manifest of bioinformatics packages installed on a running CloudBiolinux system (VM). At the EU codefest a web representation was created that parsed the manifest, pulled some more information from the Debian package information and generates the page http://www.biogems.info/biolinux.html.
 +
 
 +
The new overview led to a discussion on BioLinux/Debian packaging:
 +
 
 +
The overview helps the different parties focus on priorities (with packaging software).
 +
 
 +
Brad writes: From the Debian/Bio-Linux/packaging side, I'm happy to modify where we
 +
pull packages from. The goal is to have everything in single
 +
repositories to be community maintained so I'm similarly happy if some
 +
of the CloudBioLinux specific builds pick up package maintainers. The
 +
(CloudBiolunx) custom scripts now are there of necessity and not meant to be permanent.
 +
I'm also digging into nix so if there are any packages there that we've
 +
missed and would be useful, we can move that direction as well. It was also noted that proper Debian packages also track
 +
popularity statistics (based on installation of Debian).
 +
 
 +
Steffen added: My general concern (and motivation) is community forming and an avoidance
 +
of redundancies. That is why a nice friendly embracing email sent to the
 +
Debian/Ubuntu folks on Debian Med I consider important. Your efforts should
 +
be perceived as a continuation of the Debian Med efforts, not as a competition.
  
 +
=== BioWSR ===
  
−
== Location ==
+
In bioinformatics, and in general life sciences, there are plenty of web services built following the different web service paradigms and bioinformatic web service variants: REST
 +
, SOAP, BioMOBY[1], DAS[2], BioMart[3], etc... Although there are already web service repositories like BioMOBY and web service catalogues like BioCatalogue[4] or DASRegistry[5],
 +
we feel that many of the existing solutions are not extensible enough to be applied to new web service paradigms. Even worse, in some cases the source code of the registry is
 +
not available, so it cannot be reused, improved or extended.
 +
 
 +
So we (at INB) started the design and implementation of a new web service repository (in Ruby) that will allow us (and anyone using the codebase we are developing) to document and manage the web services developed by different groups, being open and extensible to the entire
 +
range of web service paradigms and variants used in bioinformatics. Due to the large web
 +
service portfolio the INB possesses, one of the main concerns when designing BioWSR was
 +
that web services from any paradigm should be describable at a certain level. As the new registry is strongly inspired by the BioMOBY repository, one requisite was that RDF triples should be a superset of the ones used in BioMOBY to make it backward compatible.
 +
 
 +
=== GFF3/GTF tools ===
 +
 
 +
During the codefest we collected info on what requirements are
 +
there for GFF3/GTF tools, and worked on Debian packages for the same
 +
tools
 +
 
 +
=== Debian packaging ===
  
−
[http://www.tecnoparco.org/ Parco Tecnologico Padano]
+
We introduced a few people to Debian packaging and key signing. For CloudBiolinux we encourage further Debian packaging of both BioLinux packages, and custom build scripts. It was noted, for example, that Debian has a more recent version of Jalview than the biolinux-jalview package.
−
vie Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza
 
−
26900, [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.31&lon=9.508&zoom=10&layers=M Lodi] - ITALY
 
  
−
=== Further info ===
+
=== RNA-seq visualisation ===
  
−
See the [http://tecnoparco.org/codefest registration] page.
+
We were working on NGS, more specifically looking to our RNA sequencing project... Just wanted to check with you guys if everyone follows the same methods/pipeline for RNA sequencing. Also managed to set up Gbrowser with help of Paulo for our RNA seq project and also looked to other visualization tools. Meeting you guys and learning from the group was really helpful. Now I have a feeling to work on some of the open source projects but I guess I need to learn bit more to reach that level.

Latest revision as of 20:20, 30 July 2013

EU-codefest 2012 was 19 and 20 July in Lodi Italy

In coordination with the BOSC committee we organised the first EU-Codefest, a low-key event the week after BOSC 2012 in California.

15 people attended the EU-Codefest, which took place on 19 and 20 July 2012, in Lodi, Italy, near Bergamo and Milano.

The EU-Codefest is modeled on the successful biohackathons in Japan, though we like it more free-flowing.

The weekend after 21 and 22 July continued (unofficially) to have a good time, and organised some outings.

Organising committee: Francesco Strozzi, Raoul Bonnal and Pjotr Prins

Location

Parco Tecnologico Padano vie Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza 26900, Lodi - ITALY

Topics

Three main topics were worked on during the CodeFest:

  • NGS and high performance parsers for OpenBio projects.
  • RDF and semantic web for bioinformatics.
  • Bioinformatics pipelines definition, execution and distribution.

During the conference we discussed current issues and added

  • Service discovery and integration (Debian, BioMoby, biogems.info, BioLinux)
  • Workflow (bio-ngs, Galaxy, Taverna)
  • PBS (bio-ngs)
  • Software
    • bio-ngs
    • bio-maf introducing into pipeline
    • gff3
    • biogems.info (Debian packages)
    • bio-table (RDF support)
    • biowsr

Talks

The following talks/introductions/micro-presentations were given at the Codefest:

  • Semantic Web for the Integrated Genomic Data by Toshiaki Katayama, Database Center for Life Science, Tokyo, Japan
  • Writing the worlds fastest GFF3 parser by Marjan Povolni, Faculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Debian packaging by Steffen Möller, University of Lübeck, Germany
  • BioWSR Bioinformatic Web Services Registry project update by José María Fernández González, Protein Design Group, CNB-CSIC Cantoblanco, Madrid,

Spain

  • RNA-seq project introduction by James Tojo, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Software resources for Bioinformatics, including http://biogems.info/ by Pjotr Prins, Wageningen University, The Netherlands

Reports

Bio-ngs

We worked on developing bio-ngs to better handle pipelines and reproducible workflows, plus semantic databases to manage and query NGS sec ondary analysis data.

Bio RDF support

During the codefest we discussed the ins- and outs of graph stores, and the semantic web (triple stores). We now share a vision on how to move forward, using RDF for biological analysis. The next biohackathon will be in Japan in September 2012. Four of us will be there to continue this work.

Adding a list of BioLinux Software packages to biogems.info

We recognise is it often hard to find relevant information on current software packages. At the USA codefest, a week earlier, Brad Chapman and Hervé Ménager created a Manifest of bioinformatics packages installed on a running CloudBiolinux system (VM). At the EU codefest a web representation was created that parsed the manifest, pulled some more information from the Debian package information and generates the page http://www.biogems.info/biolinux.html.

The new overview led to a discussion on BioLinux/Debian packaging:

The overview helps the different parties focus on priorities (with packaging software).

Brad writes: From the Debian/Bio-Linux/packaging side, I'm happy to modify where we pull packages from. The goal is to have everything in single repositories to be community maintained so I'm similarly happy if some of the CloudBioLinux specific builds pick up package maintainers. The (CloudBiolunx) custom scripts now are there of necessity and not meant to be permanent. I'm also digging into nix so if there are any packages there that we've missed and would be useful, we can move that direction as well. It was also noted that proper Debian packages also track popularity statistics (based on installation of Debian).

Steffen added: My general concern (and motivation) is community forming and an avoidance of redundancies. That is why a nice friendly embracing email sent to the Debian/Ubuntu folks on Debian Med I consider important. Your efforts should be perceived as a continuation of the Debian Med efforts, not as a competition.

BioWSR

In bioinformatics, and in general life sciences, there are plenty of web services built following the different web service paradigms and bioinformatic web service variants: REST , SOAP, BioMOBY[1], DAS[2], BioMart[3], etc... Although there are already web service repositories like BioMOBY and web service catalogues like BioCatalogue[4] or DASRegistry[5], we feel that many of the existing solutions are not extensible enough to be applied to new web service paradigms. Even worse, in some cases the source code of the registry is not available, so it cannot be reused, improved or extended.

So we (at INB) started the design and implementation of a new web service repository (in Ruby) that will allow us (and anyone using the codebase we are developing) to document and manage the web services developed by different groups, being open and extensible to the entire range of web service paradigms and variants used in bioinformatics. Due to the large web service portfolio the INB possesses, one of the main concerns when designing BioWSR was that web services from any paradigm should be describable at a certain level. As the new registry is strongly inspired by the BioMOBY repository, one requisite was that RDF triples should be a superset of the ones used in BioMOBY to make it backward compatible.

GFF3/GTF tools

During the codefest we collected info on what requirements are there for GFF3/GTF tools, and worked on Debian packages for the same tools

Debian packaging

We introduced a few people to Debian packaging and key signing. For CloudBiolinux we encourage further Debian packaging of both BioLinux packages, and custom build scripts. It was noted, for example, that Debian has a more recent version of Jalview than the biolinux-jalview package.

RNA-seq visualisation

We were working on NGS, more specifically looking to our RNA sequencing project... Just wanted to check with you guys if everyone follows the same methods/pipeline for RNA sequencing. Also managed to set up Gbrowser with help of Paulo for our RNA seq project and also looked to other visualization tools. Meeting you guys and learning from the group was really helpful. Now I have a feeling to work on some of the open source projects but I guess I need to learn bit more to reach that level.

Retrieved from "https://www.open-bio.org/w/index.php?title=EU_Codefest_2012&oldid=2939"